A place for me to pour out my rants without clogging the inboxes of my friends and family. Also a place to give info on myself and Mary, our family news and events.
...or simply a Pyrrhic Victory for Big Government?
Published on December 29, 2009 By Rightwinger In US Domestic

61% of Americans do not want the health care bill; Washington knows this, yet insists on ignoring its constituents. Are they insane? Maybe. Are they delusional? Perhaps.

So, on a Sunday night-Monday morning, literally in the dead of night when few were watching, the Senate passed the health care bill.

It's likely they, the Democrats, are committing political suicide over this, but they seem perfectly willing to do so; to implement a policy relatively few of their constituents actually support. Why?

Personally, I think it's because they recognize and crave the power this could grant them. The health care bill, even if it cost them seats in the House and Senate, which it's almost certainly guaranteed to do, would nonetheless represent a huge step toward a completely centralized government, which so many of them obviously support.

Obama, remember, promised not to raise taxes on those earning less than $250,000 per year; I guess he’s not, technically. But with no tax increase, exactly how are we to pay for all this?

For one, insurance rates will dramatically increase under the bill, due to taxes/fees imposed on providers.

Economics 101: these will then get passed along to the consumer--in all tax brackets--becoming an “indirect tax”; the government might not be imposing the tax, but the hammer comes down, regardless.

If actually implemented, as we know, it wouldn’t take effect until 2013, anyway, but don't worry; we’ll start paying taxes on it right away. This is, of course, to make it appear as though we have plenty of money, up front, to pay for this insane scheme.

 Given this, we might have a few hundred billion or so to start it off with, but that won’t last long.

The Congressional Budget Office says we’ll burn through that rather quickly; this is going to cost an achingly large sum. It’ll cost anywhere between $900 billion and $1 trillion for the first ten years, alone. After that, who knows?

With people running to the hospital for “free” care, seeking treatment for things they’d normally ignore or ride out, free abortions and sex changes, the tab could get quite stiff.

The arrogant, possibly insane or delusional Democrats ignore these arguments, however, plunging ahead, literally bribing skeptical or fence-sitting legislators with various tempting, porky “goodies”, to secure their votes. If I did that, I'd go to prison. In Congress, however, it's par for the course.

In a heartwarming show of bipartisanship, Republicans were--utterly--disallowed from attending the closed-door discussions on this bill.

Democrats only, son.

This is Democrat “transparency” and “ethics”? This is Obama’s “post-partisan” presidency?

I guess they’re the intellectual elite, so they must know better, right?

Everywhere universal healthcare is implemented, quality and efficiency suffer; “rationing” of care results.

“Well,” liberals often say, “insurance companies do that, now!” But, isn’t that what they’re trying to change? Cold, calculating, discriminatory “greed”, for the caring, compassionate, Socialist nanny-state?

Under Socialized medicine, people often have to wait weeks or months to see a doctor; "Well," liberals say, "isn't that the way it is, now?"

But if it’s ultimately the same, why go to all the bother and expense?

Despite wording and promises, it’s all the same, really; only government would be more directly involved, then.

Eventually, no matter what they say, they’ll leach away private sector competition, with taxes and fees, leaving only the One-Payer system they yearn for: inefficient, wasteful Governmental control. And when has government ever made anything better?

Liberals like to pretend that unless we pass health care, the streets will be piled with people, dropping dead, lacking health insurance.

That doesn’t happen now, even with the unfair, horror-filled dungeons shrieking liberals portray as modern medical care.

Laws already exist, requiring hospitals to treat anyone who comes in. It’s not flawless; sometimes, people fall through the cracks. Welcome to reality.

Like the “man-made” global warming scam, it’s about wielding power; that’s all.

Liberal busybodies, delighting in telling others how to live; Progressive politicians, on both sides, seeking as much influence as possible.

“Progressive”; sounds nice, doesn’t it? Progressives, however, favor empowering the government over the individual, and they’re everywhere.

Perhaps some people like the idea of nosy bureaucrats concerning themselves with every morsel they consume, or whether their hobbies are too risky. I don’t.

61% of us realize this is a bad thing; we know that anywhere between 10 and 25 million will still be left without coverage; that Medicare will be cut by over $400 billion. We know this, and don’t want it, but it’s being forced down our throats, regardless.

61% of us oppose Obamacare; the Socialist neo-Democrats know they’re probably giving away the 2010 elections, but they’re perfectly willing to fall on that sword, to ensure that, in the future, Government ultimately becomes the deciding factor in every aspect of our lives. How heroic of them.

Stand fast, America.


Comments
on Dec 29, 2009

Obama, remember, promised not to raise taxes on those earning less than $250,000 per year; I guess he’s not, technically. But with no tax increase, exactly how are we to pay for all this?


Technically or not, he is lying.  Taxes will go up regardless of income.  See this link (no conservative mouth piece!)

http://www.boston.com/business/personalfinance/managingyourmoney/archives/2009/12/tax_increases_a.html

Liberals like to pretend that unless we pass health care, the streets will be piled with people, dropping dead, lacking health insurance.


Then one wonders why liberals WANT that to happen since they are denying coverage for 4 years.

Over all great article.   I just hate that no one is calling Harry hypocrite on the 14k dead each day because of lack of health care, and the fact he wants to kill another 20 million people with his health care?

on Dec 30, 2009

http://www.boston.com/business/personalfinance/managingyourmoney/archives/2009/12/tax_increases_a.html

Interesting to see that while peoples taxes won't directly be changed in most cases we will still pay up the ying yang for this bill. Even more interesting how so many are oblivious to this. It's my opinion that economics and the US Gov't system should be part of the US education system like Math, English and History are.

on Dec 30, 2009

I saw a news program the other day where the host was interviewing a liberal guest. The topic was health care. When the host stated that now young people will be forced to carry insurance, the guest shot back "the parents will be able to keep them on their policies until age 27". The host responded so now the parents pay larger premiums for a longer period. The guest just gave a big grin, and the interview was over.

What a confidence scheme this is turning out to be. They are desperately trying to find new places to hide the costs. Does anyone really want to be responsible for  their 27 year old "child's" insurance? And if we are going to treat people up to this age group as children, why not make that the new age to vote, drink, and smoke? The government finds new ways to keep people from being responsible. But I digress. How many families making under $250K will this effect? Answer: All of them. The only difference is instead of calling this a tax, they call it a premium.

I'm pretty tired of people comparing this to car insurance, too. No one is required by law to own a car, and many people in large cities don't have one. If you stop paying your car insurance, you must stop driving your car. You are not fined and thrown in jail for not renewing your car insurance.

This scheme has to be unconstitutional. It will be the first tax for being alive in the history of the US.

on Dec 30, 2009

They are desperately trying to find new places to hide the costs.

And I thought the problem was that Healthcare was too expensive. So Healthcare stays expensive or gets worse the Gov't found someone else to pay for it. I can't quite figure out whos dumber, the politicians passing this or those who voted for these politicians.

on Dec 30, 2009

Interesting to see that while peoples taxes won't directl

That depends on your definition of what the word is is (or in Obama's case - what a tax is).  Clearly everyone is going to pay more.  And the money is going to a federal program.  Whether you call that a fee, a reverse grant, or Uncle Sam's slush fund, the end result is it is a tax.  A tax increase on everyone.

Obama is lying through his teeth, And the idiots are still quibbling about the word is.

on Dec 30, 2009

What most people are ignoring, too, is the fact that energy costs are due to fly through the roof in the next year or so, too.

Add that in with the possibility of health care, and I think it's pretty clear that, within a few years, few to no one would be able to afford health ins., anyway. Therefore, the only alternative will be......

on Dec 30, 2009

Therefore, the only alternative will be......

Abomination Care

on Dec 31, 2009

what I want to know is who is going to police this thing?  It is extremely complicated! 

It took a committee over one thousand pages to outline their heath care proposal but it took the Founding Fathers only about 14 pages to write the Constitution and it took God only 10 commandments for the laws for humanity. 

What a mess.  Who's going to be responsible for monitoring the tax returns ?    Who's going to be looking at the  businesses making sure this stuff is going to be done? 

This is a brand new monsterous tax code with loopholes galore and many different interpretations attached to it.  It probably means setting up a brand new specialized accounting system to regulate all this.

on Dec 31, 2009

~~~"What a mess.  Who's going to be responsible for monitoring the tax returns ?    Who's going to be looking at the  businesses making sure this stuff is going to be done?"---KFC~~~

Well, don't forget; Obama did promise over 600,000 new government jobs. There you go.

Dr Guy

Therefore, the only alternative will be......


Abomination Care

Exactly; and I hate to be a conspiracy nut, here, but the $400 billion in cuts to Medicare represent one thing, to me.

Look at it this way....the Boomer generation was the biggest population surge in American history. The first few years of you guys are starting to hit the age, now, when you are/will be hooking up into the system. For the next 25-30 years or so, you'll be a huge strain on that system.

By cutting services and available benfits, they'll likely be, well, let's call it "shortening the time" you'll be such a strain. I mean, thanks to the short-sightedness, apathy and greed of Congress, they're already trying to blame you folks for ruining Social Security. There's just too darn many of you!

Anyone who would support unlimited murder of innocent, unborn children, even into the third trimester, would obviously think little of precluding the lives of the elderly.

on Jan 01, 2010

what I want to know is who is going to police this thing? It is extremely complicated!

KFC does this even matter? Surely you know what happens to people that "cheat" the system? For some, like Charley Rangold, Tim Geithner and Tom Daschel, nothing happens. All they say is oops, sorry and all is forgiven. They even keep their jobs you help pay for. Now you or I.... somehow I don't think sorry is enough.

on Jan 01, 2010

And so it begins:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aHoYSI84VdL0

 

on Jan 01, 2010

And so it begins:

This is the information that is being buried, if it's reported at all.

on Jan 02, 2010

What I find amusingly sad, is how many of them on Obama's side have simply bought right into the ridiculous notion that our health care system is something out of the Dark Ages. Obama/Pelosi/Reid says it's a horrific mess, so it's a horrific mess. Yeah, it needs some reform, but not the complete economic and ideological overhaul they propose.

I just wonder how many of them actually thought it was so bad, before Obama said it was so bad, you know?

on Jan 02, 2010

that our health care system

That is the rub.  ALl this talk and legislating, all 4000+ pages do NOTHING for health care.  Not one damn thing.  They do pontificate amd posture, but it is all about insurance.  Which does not mean a damn thing when it comes to the quality of care.