A place for me to pour out my rants without clogging the inboxes of my friends and family. Also a place to give info on myself and Mary, our family news and events.
The end is in sight
Published on July 10, 2007 By Rightwinger In The Environment
Global Warming is not going as planned; the disastrously rising temperatures and massive environmental catastrophes activists of the environmental left have sobbed and tooted their horns over for twenty-plus years have not emerged. For this reason, "Global Warming" has been re-designated slightly more vague, less-definable verbiage. Perhaps you’ve heard of it; it’s now referred to as "Climate Change". Global Warming is a lie.
After Katrina in 2005, GW proponents hysterically predicted increasingly worse hurricane seasons; the world is heating up! Things will obviously worsen! 2006 was one of the calmest hurricane seasons in decades; 2007 hasn’t exactly been Doomsday, either. A 2006 North Pole expedition, studying the long-term negative effects of GW, was postponed, due to unusually harsh cold, snow and ice.
With the obvious dearth of long-predicted (and somewhat more than fashionably late), epic ecological disasters, purveyors of Global Warming mythology are working overtime to shove GW-related legislation and regulations down the throats of We, the People, before we completely wake up to reality.
Winter 2006-07, though late in coming, was one of the worst in recent record, and thus, one of the worst for GW-drum beaters, now scrambling, pushing desperately hard for their cause; half the country was encased in ice and snow. Dozens died across America, killed by weather-related incidents; billions lost in crop revenues, due to freakishly low temperatures in California and Florida. Finally, skeptical opposition arises. Books and scientific studies become more and more prominent, despite the GW Nazis efforts to squelch them, and any opposition to their orthodoxy.
Here’s how it works….overzealous environmentalism is a leftist ideal. Leftist ideologues tend to promote Socialist economies, opposing American-style Capitalism; the environmentalists advance their cause using mush-brained celebrities, compliant liberal idealists and impressionable, easily frightened children and adolescents.
If they can utilize governmental regulation to hamstring our economy, the strongest, most resilient in the world, it would give their beloved Socialist states of the European Union---and the few remaining zombie totalitarian Communist nations---a chance to fill the vacuum. So far, it’s worked pretty well, really. Much of the heavy industry (and its money) in America is gone, headed overseas, to nations like India, China and Venezuela, for example. Nations with little to no environmental regulation, something the GW faithful and environmentalist flag-wavers overlook. Seemingly, such regulation only applies in America, where, apparently, we should all be living in mud huts and riding bicycles made of recycled toilet paper.
Al Gore has a "solution": "carbon offsets", or credits, to be purchased, allowing the holder to pollute as much as they want, so long as it’s not beyond that allowed by their number of credits. It must work; his mansion uses $30,000 a year in carbon-polluting utilities! Yet, Gore calls us to conserve. Save Mother Earth! If this Climate Change thing is successfully fed to the masses (or Congress), Gore stands to make tons of cash.
Moderate environmentalism is fine; it’s simply good stewardship. Everyone wants trees and animals, clean water and breathable air. It’s just that too much of anything is bad, and radical--politically-motivated--whacko environmentalism is too much. Call it whatever you will, Global Warming is still a lie.

Comments
on Jul 12, 2007
After the global cooling debacle, and the now global warming debacle maybe they should just try a 'global behaving as it wants to' freak out.

This way they can't lose anymore. Millions of people can rally crying nature is doing what it wants to do!, can't out scientists make it behave? People can carry protest signs saying , I just washed my car and it rained why can't Bush do something about it? I just hung my clothes out to dry {in February, in Maine} and it froze, why can't Bush do something about this?
on Jul 12, 2007
Moderate environmentalism is fine; it’s simply good stewardship. Everyone wants trees and animals, clean water and breathable air. It’s just that too much of anything is bad, and radical--politically-motivated--whacko environmentalism is too much.


That is a great summation as it does hit many of the high points. Global warming has nothing to do with saving the planet (from what? Itself?), and everything to do with a secular religion that will supplant God and bring about a new testament.

And more so, the facade is falling apart. As each new factor is put into the hopper to prove their point, and winds up not being explainable, they hope that no one will see those inconsistancies - and to that they now label those who do not toe the line as "New age nazis" and holocause deniers. If their truth was so evident, they would not be so much in a hurry to debate the skeptics - instead of trying to silence them.
on Jul 12, 2007
they are also using the word traitor for anyone who doesn't believe in global warming. and dictator gene wonders why i call him dictator
on Jul 14, 2007
Winter 2006-07, though late in coming, was one of the worst in recent record, and thus, one of the worst for GW-drum beaters, now scrambling, pushing desperately hard for their cause; half the country was encased in ice and snow. Dozens died across America, killed by weather-related incidents; billions lost in crop revenues, due to freakishly low temperatures in California and Florida. Finally, skeptical opposition arises. Books and scientific studies become more and more prominent, despite the GW Nazis efforts to squelch them, and any opposition to their orthodoxy.


Lord save us. The severe nature of the event discribed is a classic sign of Global Warming, the latter will cause such severe weather patterns.

Whether or not Global Warming is actually happening is of course the great debate, but in order to participate in a debate, at least research the background to the topic,m and the alledged cause and effect of Global Warming. Not to do so as above totally destroys the post and obvious passionate personal views, to a meaningless nothing.

I personally believe it is happening, and faster than we realise. However I also believe its a natural weather cycle - the evidence for this is overwhelming. The Earth has for millions of years gone through weather cycles, Ice Ages yaddie yadda, its a natural phenomina of the Planet. There is an argument to say that the latest cycle has been accelarated since the Industrial Revolution a hundred years ago, and that maybe true, but if so only by a few decades, meanwhile the larger more significant cycle of events is unstoppable.

The whole saga has however raised a valid point - we should look after our Planet better, and prevent huge detrimental environmental effects in various parts of the world - eg the appauling environmental conditions in Chinese industrial cities, abuse of river systems that dry up and stop agricultural irregation, the drying up of various inner seas in Southern Russia for Hydro Electirc purposes turning a 4000 square mile inner sea into a dust bowl, devastating the lives of the local inhabitants. That much is common sense, although hard to achieve when there are other conflicting priorities around - nothing is ever simple - there will always be conflicting priorities, as there will always be those on either side of the debate who seek to over-simplify the issues involved.

Meanwhile we should all search our minds and ask what our motivation in making a stance on the topic is - notority, conviction, a love of their air conditioner, cheap petrol and gas guzzlers - whatever - but in doing so facts, not irresponsible selfish myths based on personal greed/gain, and the attendent half truths, need to be uttered, or we all go in circles.



on Jul 14, 2007
I personally believe it is happening, and faster than we realise. However I also believe its a natural weather cycle - the evidence for this is overwhelming.


That is actually how many (if not most) of the "opposition" to the Al Gores beleive. It is what I have said many times.

But until and unless we understand how it is happening and why, doing something to correct a non-problem (or one out of our control) may do more harm than good.

Doing nothing is often the best course when you do not understand what ailment is afflicting the patient. (this does not mean that we should pollute until the skies turn black - as pollution control is the solution to other problems outside of the climate debate).