A place for me to pour out my rants without clogging the inboxes of my friends and family. Also a place to give info on myself and Mary, our family news and events.
Okay, Lefites.....sorry to be the one to pour salt on yet another of your snails, but the "failed" government in Iraq is at last beginning to take shape. All it takes is time, which you are not at all willing to give.
Of course, this being an AP report, they had to temper this good news with a body count, but what else can we expect from the MSM?




Iraqi Leaders End Deadlock Amid Violence
By QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA


BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - Iraq's president designated Shiite politician Jawad al-Maliki to form a new government Saturday, starting a process aimed at healing ethnic and religious wounds and pulling the nation out of insurgency and sectarian strife.

The move ends months of political deadlock among Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds that threatened to drag the nation into civil war. Al-Maliki has 30 days to present his Cabinet to parliament for approval.

Parliament elected President Jalal Talabani, a Kurd, to a second term and gave the post of parliament speaker to Mahmoud al-Mashhadani, a Sunni Arab. Al-Mashhadani's two deputies were to be Khalid al-Attiyah, a Shiite, and Aref Tayfour, a Kurd.

The tough-talking al-Maliki was nominated by the Shiites on Friday after outgoing Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari gave up his bid for another term. Al-Jaafari's attempt to stay in office was adamantly opposed by Sunnis and Kurds, causing a monthslong deadlock while the country's security crisis worsened in the wake of December's election.

U.S. and Iraqi officials hope that a national unity government representing Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds will be able to quell both the Sunni-led insurgency and bloody Shiite-Sunni violence that has raged during the political uncertainty. If it succeeds, it could enable the U.S. to begin withdrawing its 133,000 troops.

Five U.S. soldiers were killed Saturday, including four whose vehicle hit a roadside bomb while patrolling south Baghdad, the military said.

A fifth soldier died of injuries suffered in a roadside bomb attack south of Baghdad, the U.S. command said in a separate statement. It was unclear whether the soldier was fatally wounded in the same attack that killed the four others.

At least 2,388 members of the U.S. military have died since the war began, according to an Associated Press count.

The Bush administration praised Baghdad's political breakthrough, saying Iraqis were ``well on their way'' to forming a governing coalition and had made an inspired choice for prime minister.

``This is somebody with whom we can work,'' Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice told reporters in a conference call. While Rice has never met al-Maliki, she called him an ``Iraqi patriot'' and said, ``He's thought to be a strong figure, someone who's capable of getting things done.''

Suspected insurgents, meanwhile, set off two bombs in a public market in central Iraq, killing at least two Iraqis and wounding 17. The second blast was timed to hit emergency crews arriving at the scene.

The first bomb exploded at 7:30 a.m. in the middle of Muqdadiyah, about 60 miles northeast of Baghdad, causing a large fire, police said.

When fire engines arrived, the second bomb went off, killing a firefighter and a civilian, and wounding 17 civilians, police said.

The bullet-ridden bodies of 10 Iraqis were found in and around Baghdad, many blindfolded with their hands and legs bound in rope. Some appeared to have been tortured, and one had been decapitated, police said.

Police also found a body with signs of torture floating in the Tigris River in Kut, 100 miles southeast of Baghdad, said Hadi al-Ittabi, an employee of the Kut Forensic Center.

In Baghdad, gunmen in a speeding car sprayed a police patrol with machine-gun fire, killing one officer, police said. Gunmen killed a civilian riding in a car, and a roadside bomb wounded two policemen, police said.

U.S. and Iraqi forces also fought an hour-long gunbattle with insurgents in Ramadi, a center of Iraq's Sunni Arab-dominated insurgency, and four militants were killed and two Iraqi soldiers wounded, American officials said.

On Friday, at least 22 Iraqis were killed, including six in a car bombing in Tal Afar in western Iraq and six off-duty Iraqi soldiers slain in Beiji in northern Iraq, police said.

An Australian soldier shot himself in the head in a ``tragic accident'' inside Baghdad's Green Zone housing the U.S. Embassy and Iraqi government buildings, Australian defense officials said Saturday.

He was the Australian military's first casualty since the Iraq war began in 2003. Last year, an Australian-British citizen serving in Britain's Royal Air Force was killed.

Al-Maliki has a reputation as a hard-line, outspoken defender of the Shiite stance - raising questions over whether he will be able to negotiate the delicate sectarian balancing act.

From exile in Syria in the 1980s and 1990s, he directed Dawa guerrillas fighting Saddam Hussein's regime. Since returning home after Saddam's fall, he has been a prominent member of the commission purging former Baath Party officials from the military and government.

Sunni Arabs, who made up the backbone of Saddam's ousted party, deeply resent the commission.

Al-Maliki also was a tough negotiator in drawn-out deliberations over the new constitution passed last year despite Sunni Arab objections. He resisted U.S. efforts to put more Sunnis on the drafting committee as well as Sunni efforts to water down provisions giving Shiites and Kurds the power to form semiautonomous mini-states in the north and south.

Sunnis and Kurds blamed the rise of sectarian tensions on al-Jaafari, saying he failed to rein in Shiite militias and Interior Ministry commandos, accused by the Sunnis of harboring death squads. Those parties refused to join any government headed by al-Jaafari.

Al-Jaafari, prime minister since April 2005, was nominated by the alliance for a second term in February by a one-vote margin, relying on support from radical, anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.

Al-Jaafari had stalwartly rejected pressure to give up the post until Iraq's most powerful Shiite cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, sent word that he should go. On Thursday, al-Jaafari gave the alliance the go-ahead to pick a new nominee.

The new prime minister nominee will now face the task of putting together a national unity government, meaning divvying up the ministries among Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish parties.

One source of conflict is likely to be the powerful Interior Ministry, which currently is held by SCIRI. Sunnis probably will push for a change and demand the uprooting of Shiite militias from the ministry's security forces.


04/22/06 15:26 © Copyright The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained In this news report may not be published, broadcast or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Pres

Comments
on Apr 22, 2006
Hello RW, Good news indeed! This lefty is happy to see this. Now, perhaps you'll join me in asking that our troops return home safely. Be well.
on Apr 22, 2006
Hello RW, Good news indeed! This lefty is happy to see this. Now, perhaps you'll join me in asking that our troops return home safely. Be well.
on Apr 22, 2006
Heh ironic - did you read the last line of your quotation? AP demands a press fee you know, and with blogging coming increasingly under press laws these days you could get in trouble for that.

On the article itself...

The fact that Condaleeza Rice says the new PM is someone the US 'can work with' worries me slightly. Particularly when she calls him 'strong'. Strong leaders are good, of course, but they also tend towards dictatorial rule, which isn't so good. I suppose we'll see how it goes over the next few years.

He is a compromise candidate though so that's a bonus - he won't have the parliamentary strength to draw all of the power into his own office.

It's sad to see as well that an Aussie soldier committed suicide. I've heard the situation over there is tough on the soldiers, but I didn't think an Aussie would crack. I guess it goes to show no people is immune to the horror of civil war.
on Apr 27, 2006
Hello RW, Good news indeed! This lefty is happy to see this.


Hello, Sodaiho. You're happy about it? A lefty?! Well, that makes one of you!

Now, perhaps you'll join me in asking that our troops return home safely.



I've been wishing that since 10/01.

Be well.


Thanks. You, too.



Heh ironic - did you read the last line of your quotation? AP demands a press fee you know, and with blogging coming increasingly under press laws these days you could get in trouble for that.
---cacto

If I was making money on it, I could see why they'd be unhappy. But I'm not, so I won't worry much. Thanks for pointing it out, though.



The fact that Condaleeza Rice says the new PM is someone the US 'can work with' worries me slightly. Particularly when she calls him 'strong'. Strong leaders are good, of course, but they also tend towards dictatorial rule, which isn't so good. I suppose we'll see how it goes over the next few years.


Margaret Thatcher and Reagan both said the same thing about Gorbachev. That turned out alright in the end. If they get a real constitution and follow it, it should be okay...but we'll see.

It's sad to see as well that an Aussie soldier committed suicide. I've heard the situation over there is tough on the soldiers, but I didn't think an Aussie would crack. I guess it goes to show no people is immune to the horror of civil war.


They said it was an accident.

Funny how I haven't heard much about this in the MSM, you know? It's pretty big news, all told. But then the MSM wants us to fail in Iraq, so to them it isn't.
on Apr 27, 2006
They said it was an accident.


Yeah, I heard that over the weekend as well. He was handling his rifle and somehow it went off. Some military expert was on the TV saying that the model used by the Australian Army had a tendency to do that because of its design. I dunno. It sounds suspect to me but it wouldn't do anyone any good to argue it wasn't an accident, especially when I'm happily ignorant about guns.
on Apr 27, 2006
Good news, good news. Let's hope it all goes well.

Now, perhaps you'll join me in asking that our troops return home safely.


Don't get me wrong when I say this but the left are not the only ones wanting their boys home. The right wants them as home just as much, we just like finishing what we started, right or wrong. If you know what I mean.
on Apr 27, 2006
If I was making money on it, I could see why they'd be unhappy. But I'm not, so I won't worry much. Thanks for pointing it out, though.


Actually, it does matter. You can get sued no matter how much profit (including none) you got from coping the article. It's not under 'fair use' law and it's called plagiarism.
on Apr 27, 2006
#3 by cactoblasta
Saturday, April 22, 2006

Heh ironic - did you read the last line of your quotation? AP demands a press fee you know, and with blogging coming increasingly under press laws these days you could get in trouble for that.



#7 by XX
Thursday, April 27, 2006


Plagiarism is a form of academic dishonesty, specifically the unacknowledged use of another person's idea(s), information, language, or writing. Plagiarism is a serious academic offense.

Plagiarism is not necessarily the same as copyright infringement, which occurs when one violates copyright law.
Link

Copyright infringement is the unauthorized use of copyrighted material in a manner that violates one of the copyright owner's exclusive rights, such as the right to reproduce or perform the copyrighted work, or to make derivative works that build upon it. Link

Actually according to these 2 definitions cactoblasta is much more correct since on this article itself the writer, Rightwinger, added the copyright statement at the end.

04/22/06 15:26 © Copyright The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained In this news report may not be published, broadcast or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press


This is not Plagiarism because he specificaly sited the title, the writers name and that it belongs to the AP.

Iraqi Leaders End Deadlock Amid Violence
By QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA


Of course, this being an AP report,


That right there defeats the Plagiarism violation. But it could still be a copyright infringement if the AP chose to persue it and he did not ask them first. I, however would not understand why they would since he gives them the credit and helps with free PR. But, shit does happen often.
on Apr 27, 2006
The information contained In this news report may not be published,


Well looks like a copyright violation then. It's published here.
on Apr 28, 2006
IN terms of fair use, you can quote about anything you want and then discuss it, but I have to admit that reposting the entire article as a whole probably violates the copyright. Generally when I want to reference something I'll nab a couple of lines and then link the rest.

"I, however would not understand why they would since he gives them the credit and helps with free PR. But, shit does happen often."


Because their commodity is information. There's a fine line between blogging and journalism, and sadly it is going to be the plaintiffs who make the call before they sue. If you were drudge I'd say I'd be worried, but AP would probably consider this a personal blog. Either way, if you ask me, the safest thing to do is link it elsewhere and quote from it in a 'fair use' kind of way.
on Apr 28, 2006
Of course, this being an AP report, they had to temper this good news with a body count, but what else can we expect from the MSM?

Of course. It's called fair and balanced reporting. If they do it right you'll be pissed off about the 'body count' and those who apparently don't want to hear any 'good news' from Iraq will be equally unhappy about that...

I know that the 'MSM' is a target for the radical right here, but they are by definition 'mainstream' and so not in the business of only supporting your minority view, nor that of the left. When everybody's unhappy with them they're probably getting it just about right.
on Apr 28, 2006
I know that the 'MSM' is a target for the radical right here, but they are by definition 'mainstream' and so not in the business of only supporting your minority view, nor that of the left. When everybody's unhappy with them they're probably getting it just about right.


I sorry to disagree, they are in the business of telling the truth. So far there have been many stories that have been confirmed as false (I need not to mention any since plenty should come to mind). The MSM plays the ratings game, they will put out, in their own words, what they feel people want to hear just for ratings. Since you never mentioned that you work, or worked for the MSM at one point, I will have to believe you don't know anything about how they work so you don't really know what they are capable except what you have seen on TV. If I am wrong about you and the MSM than I appologize.

Everyone knows the MSM is out for Bush, but not because they hate him (probably do), but because hating Bush and bashing Bush is todays fashion. Everyone is who's anyone is doing it so everyone else want to as well.